5.2 · Accessibility & Compliant Documents

Level 5 · Expertise & Collaboration

5.2Accessibility & Compliant Documents

Goal: Check and improve the accessibility of a Word document: alternative texts, reading order, contrast, accessibility checker and compliance with standards.
Estimated time: 15 min · self-paced reading · If you only have 5 min: read “The essentials in 30s” + the diagram.

The essentials in 30 seconds

  • Alt text is required for any informative image and should describe the information, not the image itself.
  • The Accessibility Checker identifies errors, warnings and suggestions for improvement automatically.
  • Styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) and table headers are essential for accessible semantic structure.

Fil Imane — Accessibility & compliant documents

Imane is preparing a customer notice accessible to all. It adds alternative texts, checks contrasts, structures titles and checks the document with the accessibility tool.

Continuation of the common thread: a logistics SME in Algiers professionalizes its documents.

1. Why accessibility?

Digital accessibility consists of making content usable by everyone, including people with disabilities (visual, motor, cognitive). In France, the REEN law (2025) imposes the accessibility of public digital content.

An accessible document is more readable for everyone: better structure, more clarity, better navigation by screen readers. This is a win for all users, not just people with disabilities.

Word integrates native accessibility tools: checker, alternative texts, reading order. Mastering them has become essential for any professional writer.

2. Alternative texts (alt text)

Alt text is a short description of an image, read by screen readers for visually impaired users. To add it: right click on the image → Edit alternative text (or Alt+Enter → Size and properties tab).

Best practices for good alternative text:

• Be concise: 1 to 2 sentences, 125 characters maximum.
• Describe the content, not the medium (not “image of” or “photo of”).
• Include the information: if the graph shows an increase of 15%, the alternative text must mention it.
• Decorative images: leave the field empty (screen reader ignores it).
• Complex graphics: describe the key message and link to the text of the document.

3. Accessibility Checker

The Accessibility Checker automatically scans the document and flags issues. Access it via Review → Check Accessibility.

The results are classified into three levels: Errors (blocking problems, e.g.: image without alternative text), Warnings (potential problems, e.g.: low contrast), and Information (suggestions for improvement, e.g.: long text without subtitles).

For each problem, the checker offers an explanation and an automatic or manual correction. Review each category and systematically correct errors. A document with 0 errors and 0 warnings is considered accessible.

4. RGAA compliance and standards

The RGAA (General Reference for Improvement of Accessibility) is the French standard, based on the international WCAG. For publicly distributed Word documents, Level AA compliance is recommended.

Key points of the RGAA applicable to Word documents:

1. Semantic structure: use styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) rather than manual formatting.
2. Alternative texts for all informative images.
3. Logical Reading order (verifiable in the image properties).
4. Sufficient contrast between text and background (minimum ratio 4.5:1).
5. Table with defined headers (table properties → Header).
6. Language of the document entered (File → Properties).

For documents intended for web publishing, convert them to accessible PDF (File → Export → PDF) by checking the accessibility options.

Common misinterpretation: “Accessibility & compliant documents can be adjusted by feeling. » No: Alt text is required for any informative image and should describe the information, not the image itself. The Accessibility Checker identifies errors, warnings and suggestions for improvement automatically. A professional document is built using a reproducible method, not by successive edits.
Pillars of Word Accessibility The key elements for a compliant document Semantic structure→► Title Styles 1, 2, 3→► Bulleted listsnumbered→► Tables with headers→Alternative content An accessible document is also a better structured and more readable document for all users.
The key elements for a compliant document
Text version of the diagram (SEO / screen readers / translation): 1) Alt text is required for any informative image and should describe the information, not the image itself. 2) Accessibility Checker identifies errors, warnings and suggestions for improvement automatically. 3) Styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) and table headers are essential for accessible semantic structure. Lesson: apply “Accessibility & compliant documents” methodically to produce a reliable document.

🔎 Concrete example — Real-World Example — Fixing the Accessibility of an Illustrated Report

// Step 1: Review → Check Accessibility
// Result: 8 errors, 5 warnings

// Errors fixed:
// 1. Image 1 → alt text: "Quarterly progress chart
//    showing a 12% increase in Q3"
// 2. Image 2 (decorative) → alt text cleared
// 3. Table 1 → properties: "Enable column header"
// 4. Table 2 → properties: "Enable column header"

// Warnings fixed:
// 1. Low contrast → text color changed to black
// 2. Image 5 → alt text added
// 3. List without style → 'Bulleted List' style applied

// Final result: 0 errors, 0 warnings

A 30-page report with 15 images, 3 tables and graphs: check and correct accessibility.

Accessibility Checker automatically identifies common issues

Every informative image requires descriptive and concise alt text

Tables must have headers enabled to be readable by screen readers

The contrast between text and background must respect the minimum ratio of 4.5:1

Section vocabulary

Alternative text (alt text)
Short description of an image read by screen readers for visually impaired users, accessible via right-click → Edit alternative text

Simple example: Imane applies “alt text” in her professional documents.

What it is not: treat “alt text” as a detail with no impact on the document.

Reflex: Does this choice make the document clearer and more reliable?

Accessibility Checker
Word tool (Review → Check Accessibility) that automatically scans the document and flags accessibility issues

Simple example: Imane applies “Accessibility Checker” in her professional documents.

What it is not: Treat “Accessibility Checker” as a detail with no impact on the document.

Reflex: Does this choice make the document clearer and more reliable?

RGAA
General Accessibility Improvement Framework, French standard based on WCAG to assess the conformity of digital content

Simple example: Imane applies “RGAA” in her professional documents.

What it is not: treat “RGAA” as a detail with no impact on the document.

Reflex: Does this choice make the document clearer and more reliable?

Reading order
Sequence in which document elements are read by a screen reader, which must follow the logical order of the content

Simple example: Imane applies “Reading order” in her professional documents.

What it is not: treat “Reading order” as a detail with no impact on the document.

Reflex: Does this choice make the document clearer and more reliable?

In practice — Make an existing document accessible

  1. Open the document and launch Review → Check Accessibility
  2. Fix all errors (images without alt text, tables without headers)
  3. Fix warnings (contrast, list structure)
  4. Check the order in which images are played (properties → Image position)
  5. Enable table headers (right click → Table Properties → Header)
  6. Rerun the checker to confirm 0 errors and 0 warnings
  7. If the document will be published as PDF, export via File → Export → PDF with accessibility options
A Word document that complies with accessibility standards, ready to be shared or converted to an accessible PDF.

Script ready to say — Accessibility & compliant documents (25 s)

“Check and improve the accessibility of a Word document: alternative texts, reading order, contrast, accessibility checker and compliance with standards. Concretely, I check this point before distributing the document: alternative text is mandatory for any informative image and must describe the information, not the image itself. »

Short wording, to be adapted to the recipient and the context of the document.

Copy and paste template — “Accessibility & compliant documents” checklist

CHECKLIST — Accessibility & compliant documents
1. Alt text is required for any informative image and should describe the information, not the image itself.
2. Accessibility Checker identifies errors, warnings and suggestions for improvement automatically.
3. Styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) and table headers are essential for accessible semantic structure.
4. The RGAA is the French standard: aim for level AA compliance for public documents.

EXPECTED RESULT: A Word document that complies with accessibility standards, ready to be shared or converted into an accessible PDF.

Express version

Apply only the essentials and the first key point, then check the rendering in a short document.

Remote

Share a PDF and check fonts, margins and pagination before sending.

As a team

Lock in the common model and document choices to keep colleagues consistent.

Printed version

Check pagination, headers and contrast before printing.

✓ Best practices

  • Apply the styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) when writing: this is the basis of the accessible structure.
  • Add alternative texts as you insert images, not just at the end of the project.
  • Rerun the checker after each correction to validate the progressive improvement.
  • For documents published in PDF, always use the “Optimize for Accessibility” option when exporting.

✗ Common pitfalls

  • Use manual formatting (size, bold) instead of styles: the structure is unreadable for screen readers.
  • Leave alternative texts as default (“Image”): the screen reader reads “Image” without useful information.
  • Ignore the accessibility checker: Errors visible on screen may not be visible to a screen reader.
  • Forgetting table headers: The screen reader cannot associate cells with their headers.

Key takeaways

  • Alt text is required for any informative image and should describe the information, not the image itself.
  • The Accessibility Checker identifies errors, warnings and suggestions for improvement automatically.
  • Styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) and table headers are essential for accessible semantic structure.
  • The RGAA is the French standard: aim for level AA compliance for public documents.

48 hour challenge — apply tomorrow

Resume making an existing document accessible on a real document from Imane's SME: Open the document and launch Review → Check accessibility. Time it for 20 minutes and note what has changed.

Section exit checklist
  • I can explain and apply: Alt text is required for any informative image and should describe the information, not the image itself.
  • I can explain and apply: The Accessibility Checker identifies errors, warnings and suggestions for improvement automatically.
  • I can explain and apply: Styles (Heading 1, 2, 3) and table headers are essential for accessible semantic structure.
Self-assessment 1-5: I have mastered “Accessibility & compliant documents”?Can I apply it in a real document without help?

Frequently asked questions

Can a Word document be certified accessible?

Word does not provide certification, but the Accessibility Checker provides a report that you can attach to the document to prove your approach.

Do decorative images require alt text?

Yes, but the field must remain empty. This signals the screen reader to ignore it, which is the desired behavior.

How to check the reading order?

In the properties of each image (Format → Size and property), check the position of the image in the document flow. The order must match the reading logic.

Should an internal document be made accessible?

The REEN law concerns public content, but making internal documents accessible is a good practice that benefits all employees.

Check your understanding

Which Word tool automatically checks the accessibility of a document?

Additional resources (optional, to go further)

Level 5 examFresh, harder questions to test what you've learned