12 questions to validate the basics of scheduling with Meriem, project manager in an engineering & construction company in Algiers: entering tasks and their duration, structuring into a WBS, setting milestones, scheduling automatically, linking tasks, managing imposed dates and making the Gantt communicative.
Answer everything, then click Check: your score and explanations will appear.
1 · Recall
1. What is the right way to structure a project into phases in Project?
You structure the project into a hierarchy (WBS) with summary tasks, and indentation places the subtasks under their phase.
1 · Application
2. Meriem creates the “Structural works” phase above the foundations and the structure. What does she notice?
The summary task summarizes its subtasks: its duration and dates automatically derive from them, and you do not enter them.
1 · Recall
3. What distinguishes a milestone from an ordinary task?
A milestone is a zero-duration task that serves as a checkpoint and appears as a diamond, without representing work.
1 · Application
4. Meriem's schedule “does not move” when she changes a duration. Where does she start?
A frozen schedule generally indicates tasks left in manual mode: you switch them to Auto Scheduled to restore recalculation.
1 · Recall
5. What is the most common type of dependency link in a schedule?
The Finish-to-Start link is the most common: the successor task starts when the predecessor is finished. SS, FF and SF address other situations.
1 · Application
6. Meriem wants to leave 2 days of drying between the plaster and the painting. How does she model it?
A waiting time is modeled by a lag on the link — “5FS+2 d” — rather than by a frozen date or an artificially inflated duration.
1 · Arbitration
7. Meriem hesitates: link her tasks or give them fixed dates. What does she choose?
Link rather than date: links describe the real logic and let Project recalculate; if an upstream task moves, the schedule shifts.
1 · Recall
8. What is the default state of a normal task in Project?
By default, a task is “As Soon As Possible”: it follows its links (flexible, with no imposed date). You only constrain when truly necessary.
1 · Arbitration
9. The client gives Meriem a “desired” target date (non-contractual). Which tool does she favor?
For a flexible target date, the deadline is the right choice: it displays a marker and an overrun alert without blocking schedule recalculation.
1 · Application
10. Meriem wants to show the sponsor the tasks that determine the project finish. What does she do?
Displaying the critical path highlights the tasks with no float, which condition the project finish: it is the most useful information for the sponsor.
1 · Arbitration
11. Meriem's detailed Gantt prints badly and looks too dense for management. What does she favor?
You adapt the output to the audience: a careful timescale and layout for a clean PDF, and the Timeline, which is more synthetic, for management.
1 · Arbitration
12. Meriem drafts a still-vague schedule, then stabilizes it. How does she manage the scheduling mode?
Manual for drafting, automatic for steering: as soon as the schedule stabilizes, you switch the tasks back to Auto Scheduled.
What's next?
Score ≥ 80%: you master the basics of scheduling with Meriem — move on to Level 2 (resources, assignments & costs).
Score between 50% and 80%: review the failed sections (1.1 tasks & WBS, 1.2 milestones & auto mode, 1.3 links, 1.4 constraints & deadlines, 1.5 Gantt formatting), reread the course then retake the test.
Score < 50%: reread the whole level 1 while applying each 48h challenge (Meriem's WBS, milestones & modes, task chaining, deadline vs constraint, communicative Gantt) before trying again.
What next? Keep Meriem's WBS structure and link logic: level 2 plugs resources, assignments and costs into them.